Effect of NAM on Nasal Symmetry and Proportions in Patients with UCLP: A Systematic Review

Authors

  • Felicia Puspita Sari Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Udayana, Bali, Indonesia
  • Gede Wara Samsarga Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Udayana, Bali, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2042-4842
  • Kenny Satrio Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Udayana, Bali, Indonesia
  • Theodorus Kevin Putra Johansyah Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Udayana, Bali, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2741-7597
  • Jeremy Jonathan Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Udayana, Bali, Indonesia
  • Made Dwi Andhika Yogiswara Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Udayana, Bali, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6895-663X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14228/jprjournal.v9i2.341

Keywords:

Nasoalveolar molding, NAM, Unilateral cleft lip and palate, Nasal symmetry

Abstract

Introduction : Nasal reconstruction presents a challenge in case of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Correction of the nasal deformity to achieve a symmetrical nose from the deficient columella and malformed nasal cartilage in cleft patients presents a great challenge. Nasoalveolar molding (NAM) was developed as a neoadjuvant therapy for patients with cleft lip and palate to improve nasal deformity before surgical intervention. The aim of this systematic review was to understand more about the effect of NAM on nasal symmetry and proportions in patients with UCLP.

Method : We searched for manuscripts involving patients with UCLP who received NAM prior to cleft lip repair. Electronic literature searching of the PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and Google scholar databases was conducted for the studies that had been published up to December 2021.

Result : Presurgical NAM demonstrated benefits in nasolabial form when compared with patients who did not receive any presurgical infant orthopaedic appliances (PSIO). The use of presurgical NAM helps to achieve favourable reshaping of the nose and decrease the severity of the initial cleft deformity, resulting in improvement on nasolabial form. These changes lead to improved nasal symmetry and proportions in UCLP patients.

Conclusion: The preponderance of evidence in this review suggests that presurgical NAM is a beneficial adjuvant therapy for nasal deformity correction and helps achieve nasal symmetry in patients with UCLP. However, there is insufficient evidence to conclude whether presurgical NAM produces these benefits at the time of nasal maturity.

References

Impellizzeri A, Giannantoni I, Polimeni A, Barbato E, Galluccio G. Epidemiological Characteristics of Orofacial clefts and its associated congenital anomalies: retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19:290 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0980-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0980-5

Watkins SE, Meyer RE, Strauss RP, Aylsworth AS. Classification, Epidemiology, and Genetics of Orofacial Clefts. Clinics in Plastic Surgery. 2014; 41(2):149–163. DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2013.12.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2013.12.003

Barillas I, Dec W, Warren SM, Cutting CB, Grayson BH. Nasoalveolar Molding Improves Long-Term Nasal Symmetry in Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip–Cleft Palate Patients. Plastic Reconstruction Surgery Journal. 2009; 123(3): 1002-1006. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318199f46e DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318199f46e

Grayson BH, Santiago PE, Brecht LE, Cutting CB. Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding in Infants with Cleft Lip and Palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 1999;36(6):486-498. DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_1999_036_0486_pnmiiw_2.3.co_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569_1999_036_0486_pnmiiw_2.3.co_2

Malitha SG, Gonchar MN, Staffenberg DA, Grayson BH. The Effects of Nasoalveolar Molding on Nasal Proportions at the Time of Nasal Maturity. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2020;20(10):1-6. DOI: 10.1177/1055665620950139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665620950139

Sischo L, Chan JW, Stein M, Smith C, van Aalst J, Broder HL. Nasoalveolar Molding: Prevalence of Cleft Centers Offering NAM and Who Seeks It. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2012; 49(3):270-275. DOI: 10.1597/11-053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1597/11-053

Yilmaz RBN, Cakan DG. Nasolabial Morphology Following Nasoalveolar Molding in Infants With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2018;0(0):1-5. DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000004427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004427

Ruiz-Escolano MG, Martinez-Plaza A, Fernandez-Valades R, Cortes-Sanchez R, Munoz-Miguelsanz MA, Velasco-Ortega E, Perez-Urena MB, Matar-Satuf K, Espana-Lopez AJ. Nasoalveolar Molding Therapy for the Treatment of Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Improves Nasal Symmetry and Maxillary Alveolar Dimensions. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2016;27:1978-1982. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003047

Thakur S, Singh A, Diwana VK, Rani A, Thakur NS. Dynamic Changes in Nasal Symmetry after Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding in Infants with Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. African Journal of Paediatric Surgery. 2020;17:1-4. DOI: 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_5_18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ajps.AJPS_5_18

Bangun K, Sukasah CL, Kamayana JAS, Basuki A, Halim J, Nahdiyat NUP, Harsanto AN, Pramudita A. Nasal Aesthetic Evaluation Following Pre-Surgical Naso-Alveolar Molding Application: A Single-Blinded Cohort Retrospective Study in Indonesia. Jurnal Plastik Rekonstruksi. 2021;8(1):39-47. DOI: 10.14228/jprjournal.v8i1.320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14228/jprjournal.v8i1.320

Funayama E, Yamamoto Y, Oyama A, Furukawa H, Murao N, Hayashi T, Maeda T, Osawa M. Comparison of Nasal Symmetry Between Presurgical Nasal Stenting and Postsurgical Nasal Retainer Placement in Unilateral Clefts. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2019;30(1): 133-136. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004959

Ezzat CF, Chavarria C, Teichgraeber JF, Chen J-W, Stratmann RG, Gateno J, Xia JJ. Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding Therapy for the Treatment of Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Preliminary Study. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2007;44(1): 8-12. DOI: 10.1597/06-009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1597/06-009

Bhutiani N, Tripathi T, Verma M, Bhandari PS, Rai P. Assessment of Treatment Outcome of Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate and Its Postsurgical Stability. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(6):700-706. DOI: 10.1177/1055665620906293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665620906293

Gomez DF, Donohue ST, Figueroa AA, Polley JW. Nasal changes after presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) in the unilateral cleft lip nose. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012;49(6):689-700. DOI: 10.1597/11-007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1597/11-007

Keçik D, Enacar A. Effects of nasoalveolar molding therapy on nasal and alveolar morphology in unilateral cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(6):2075-80. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181be88cf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181be88cf

Kinouchi N, Horiuchi S, Yasue A, Kuroda Y, Kawai N, Watanabe K, Izawa T, Hashimoto I, Hassan AH, Tanaka E. Effectiveness of presurgical nasoalveolar molding therapy on unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity. Saudi Med J. 2018 Feb;39(2):169-178. DOI: 10.15537/smj.2018.2.21020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2018.2.21020

Chang CS, Por YC, Liou EJW, Chang CJ, Chen PKT, Noord-hoff MS. Long-term comparison of four techniques for obtaining nasal symmetry in unilateral complete cleft lip patients: A single surgeon’s experience. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2010; 126(4):1276-84. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ec21e4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ec21e4

Nayak T, Parmar R, Bonanthaya K, Shetty P. A Longitudinal Study of The Nasal Symmetry in Unilateral Cleft Lip And Palate Patients Treated With Nasoalveolar Molding. Indian J Plast Surg. 2020 Dec;53(3):371-376. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714768

Singh GD, Levy-Bercowski D, Santiago PE. Three-dimensional nasal changes following nasoalveolar molding in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: Geometric morphometrics. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2005; 42(4):403-409. doi: 10.1597/04-063.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1597/04-063.1

Mancini L, Gibson TL, Grayson BH, Flores RL, Staffenberg D, Shetye PR. Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Nasal Changes After Nasoalveolar Molding and Primary Cheilorhinoplasty in Infants With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 Jan;56(1):31-38. doi: 10.1177/1055665618771427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665618771427

Wolff KD, Grill FD, Ritschl LM. Comparative Photographic, Retrospective Analysis of Nonsyndromic Cleft Noses Treated with or without NAM. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Sep 23;8(9):e3045. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003045

Liang Z, Yao J, Chen PKT, Zheng C, Yang J. Effect of Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding on Nasal Symmetry in Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip/Palate Patients after Primary Cheiloplasty without Concomitant Nasal Cartilage Dissection: Early Childhood Evaluation. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Aug;55(7):935-940. DOIi: 10.1597/14-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1597/14-296

Williams EM, Evans CA, Reisberg DJ, BeGole EA. Nasal Outcomes of Presurgical Nasal Molding in Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. International Journal of Dentistry. 2012:1-5 DOI: 10.1155/2012/643896 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/643896

Clark SL, Teichgraeber JF, Fleshman RG, Shaw JD, Chavarria C, Kau CH, Gateno J, Xia JJ. Long-term treatment outcome of presurgical nasoalveolar molding in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2011 Jan;22(1):333-6. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31820 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318200d874

Downloads

Published

11-12-2024

How to Cite

1.
Effect of NAM on Nasal Symmetry and Proportions in Patients with UCLP: A Systematic Review. J Plast Rekons [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 11 [cited 2024 Dec. 21];9(2):70-7. Available from: https://jprjournal.com/index.php/jpr/article/view/341

Similar Articles

1-10 of 58

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.